Service Level Agreement Bedeutung
Service level agreements are also defined at different levels: ALS generally includes many components, from service definition to contract termination.  In order to ensure rigorous compliance with ALS, these agreements are often designed with specific lines of demarcation and the parties concerned must meet regularly to create an open communication forum. Rewards and penalties that apply to the supplier are often set. Most ALS also leave room for regular (annual) revisions to make changes.  A service level contract is an agreement between two or more parties, one being the customer and the other service provider. It may be a formal or informal legally binding “treaty” (for example. B internal relations within the department). The agreement may include separate organizations or different teams within an organization. Contracts between the service provider and other third parties are often referred to as SLAs (wrongly) – the level of service having been set by the (main) customer, there can be no “agreement” between third parties; these agreements are simply “contracts.” However, operational agreements or olea agreements can be used by internal groups to support ALS. If an aspect of a service has not been agreed with the customer, it is not an “ALS.” There is a customer service level agreement between the supplier and an external customer. There is an internal ALS between the supplier and its internal customers – it could be another organization, department or other site. Finally, there is a supplier ALS between the supplier and the supplier. Since the late 1980s, SLAs have been used by fixed-line operators.
Today, ALS is so widespread that large organizations have many different ALSs within the company itself. Two different units in an organization script an ALS, one unit being the customer and another the service provider. This helps maintain the same quality of service between different units of the organization and in several sites within the organization. This internal ALS script also compares the quality of service between an internal service and an external service provider.  Obligation to report errors, obligation to fix errors, service levels, etc. The aim is to make the control possibilities for the client transparent and to accurately describe overly safe performance characteristics such as performance level, reaction time and speed of machining. An important element is the level of service, which describes the agreed quality of service and contains information about the range of services (e.g. time. B, volume), availability, supplier response time, etc. The typical example is the operation of servers, which are 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with a maximum z.B failure rate of 0.1% per year and a response time of 30 minutes after reporting the damage by an external service provider that must be.  Many SLAs follow the specifications of the COMPUTER infrastructure library when applied to IT services. Uptime is also a common metric that is often used for data services such as shared hosting, virtual private servers and dedicated servers.
General agreements include network availability percentage, operating time, number of planned maintenance windows, etc. It is not uncommon for an internet service provider (or network service provider) to explicitly state its own ALS on its website.   The U.S. Telecommunications Act of 1996 does not specifically require companies to have ALS, but it does provide a framework for companies to do so in Sections 251 and 252.  Section 252 (c) (1) (“Duty to Negotiate”) obliges z.B. established local exchange operators (CIDs) to negotiate in good faith matters such as the sale of dentes` and access to whistleblowing channels.