Truth Objectivity And Agreement
In philosophy, objectivity is the concept of truth regardless of individual subjectivity (a bias caused by perception, emotions or imagination). A sentence is considered an objective truth when its conditions of truth are fulfilled without bias, caused by a sensitive subject. Scientific objectivity refers to the ability to assess without bias or outside influence. Objectivity in the moral framework requires an assessment of moral codes on the basis of the well-being of the people in society who follow it.  Moral objectivity also requires that moral codes be compared by a set of universal facts and not by subjectivity.  The measure is supposed to be a means of obtaining objective judgments, as judgments have at least a high probability of expressing the truth about objective reality. Contrary to competing subjective descriptions, an objective weather judgment would describe it as about 20oC. This judgment is the result of the use of a measuring instrument. It is unlikely that the two subjects perceiving functional thermometers will have different judgments on the outside air. Second, there will be a contract in accordance with the seller`s understanding if the buyer reasonably led the seller to believe that the buyer intended to purchase the land at a price of $15,000 per hectare. Maybe all the conversations before signing the written agreement regarding a price per hectare, and the buyer who noticed the error tried to use it.
This would be a classic case of correction based on known unilateral errors.  Suppose it is proven or accepted that the parties` actual mutual intention was the same, but not necessarily the obvious intention of having a binding agreement on the sale of the entire land at a price of USD 15,000. In this regard, there is no need to be concerned about what a sensible person would have concluded, when the application of the objective principle would in any case not result in a different result. How can a sensible person in the position of the parties infer an intention contrary to the actual mutual intent of the parties? There are, however, other uses of objectivity-related terminology. Many philosophers use the term “subjective knowledge” to refer only to knowledge of their own subjective states. This knowledge is different from knowledge of another individual`s subjective states and from the knowledge of objective reality that would be both an objective knowledge according to existing definitions. Your knowledge of another person`s subjective states can be characterized as objective knowledge, as it is probably part of the world that is “rich in objects” for you, just as you and your subjective states are part of the world that is “object” to the other person. This ethical distinction produces an aspect of the term “object” as “simple object,” as opposed to a person`s subjectivity.
In this context, the term “objectivity” can mean the mere “objectivity” of something in its moral status.